Vault
Vault on Kubernetes security considerations
Vault is a security product responsible for protecting sensitive data and serves as a single source of secrets. The Production Hardening documentation provides recommendations based on the security model assuming that Vault is deployed on VMs instead of containers. When you deploy Vault on Kubernetes, those best practices are not quite transparent. This tutorial highlights where extra precaution is needed when you deploy Vault on Kubernetes in production.
The following topics are addressed in this tutorial:
- Single vs. Multi Tenancy Runtimes
- End-to-End TLS
- Turn Off Core Dumps
- Ensure mlock is Enabled
- Container Supervisor
- Don't Run as Root
Single vs. Multi Tenancy Runtimes
The Vault Production Hardening documentation states that Vault should be the only main process running on a machine to reduce the surface area introduced by other tenants.
Limitations introduced by running Vault on Kubernetes
Consul Helm chart only allows one Consul server cluster per Kubernetes cluster. This makes Consul available to other tenants on the Kubernetes cluster which undermines the security model for Vault when using Consul as its storage backend.
Another security concern is that the Vault container is owned by root, but the
Vault executable inside the container is still run as the vault
user. This
means that the supervisor process is owned by root. Any process that escapes the
pod will have root privileges on the Kubernetes worker node. (Also, see the
Container Supervisor section.)
End-to-End TLS
Vault should always be used with Transport Layer Security (TLS) in production. If intermediate load balancers or reverse proxies are used to front Vault, they should not terminate TLS to ensure that the traffic is always encrypted in transit.
Limitations introduced by running Vault on Kubernetes
Kubernetes uses TLS throughout the system to connect disparate components.
However, Kubernetes does not verify TLS connections by default for certain
connections, and portions of the codebase include the use of InsecureSkipVerify
which precludes verification of the presented certificate.
Issue Example:
if dialer != nil {
// We have a dialer; use it to open the connection, then
// create a tls client using the connection.
netConn, err := dialer(ctx, "tcp", dialAddr)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
if tlsConfig == nil {
// tls.Client requires non-nil config
klog.Warningf("using custom dialer with no TLSClientConfig. Defaulting to InsecureSkipVerify")
// tls.Handshake() requires ServerName or InsecureSkipVerify
tlsConfig = &tls.Config{
InsecureSkipVerify: true,
}
// ...
}
Note
Refer to the TOB-K8S-013: Use of InsecureSkipVerify and other TLS weaknesses for more details.
Mitigations
- Use TLS certificates signed by a trusted Certificate Authority (CA)
- Use intermediate CA's to protect the root CA
- Verify the authenticity of the server when making client request
- Verify the authenticity of the client when responding to requests
- Require TLS 1.2+
Turn Off Core Dumps
A user or administrator that can force a core dump and has access to the resulting file can potentially access Vault encryption keys. Therefore, ensure that the process core dumps are disabled inside the container.
Limitations introduced by running Vault on Kubernetes
- Root user on the worker node can access
procfs
(process filesystem) for the containerized process - In a multi-tenant cluster, containers running with the
--privileged
flag will be able to accessprocfs
on the host machine - If this is the same machine that the Vault container is running, a process from the privileged container could exfiltrate the key from a core dump of the Vault process in the container
Mitigations
Ensure RLIMIT_CORE
is set to 0
or use the ulimit
command with the core
flag (ulimit -c 0
) inside the container to ensure your container processes
can't core dump.
Ensure mlock is Enabled
Enable memory lock (mlock
) to prevent memory swap (writing memory to disk).
Limitations introduced by running Vault on Kubernetes
Memory lock (mlock
) ensures memory from a process on a Linux system isn't
swapped (written) to disk. Extra care is needed to ensure this is properly
configured inside your container and enabled through Kubernetes.
Mitigations
Due to how capabilities are performed in Linux, the parent process that is starting the container which runs the
mlock
call must haveIPC_LOCK
capabilitiesTo enable
IPC_LOCK
in the container supervisor process, use a security context:securityContext: runAsNonRoot: true runAsUser: 1000 capabilities: add: ["IPC_LOCK"]
Ensure your container is leveraging a storage driver that supports
mlock
such asoverlayfs2
.
Container Supervisor
The supervisor process that starts your container should not run as root.
Limitations introduced by running Vault on Kubernetes
If your container starts as root, the processes that escape that container have root on the node they were started on.
Mitigations
Apply security context for your container and pod to prevent starting your container as root. (A security context is a property defined in the deployment yaml.)
Security Context Setting | Description |
---|---|
SecurityContext -> runAsNonRoot | Indicates that containers should run as non-root user |
PodSecurityContext -> runAsNonRoot | Prevents running a container with ‘root’ user as part of the pod |
Generic Kubernetes Pod example:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: hello-world
spec:
containers:
# specification of the pod’s containers
# ...
securityContext:
runAsNonRoot: true
Don't Run as Root
Vault is designed to run as an unprivileged user, and there is no reason to run Vault with root or administrator privileges which can expose the Vault process memory and allow access to Vault encryption keys.
Limitations introduced by running Vault on Kubernetes
Do not circumvent the entry point for your container. This will also circumvent
the user to use PID 1
in the container and use root instead. (Refer to Issue
#205.)
Mitigations
Follow the hardening guidelines and ensure your Vault process is not started as root user inside your container.